Another term -- the final term -- has run its course. I hope this is not my last entry on this blog, but I will most likely not maintain such a regular schedule going forward. I hope readers have found the information enlightening, engaging and interesting. The value of effective, strategic communication should not be ignored; yet most people and companies take it for granted. I hope to help change that perspective.
I am thankful for the experience and opportunity I have received in retail merchandising execution field, but I am more than ready to return to the communications field. That being said, if there happen to be any companies in need of a professional communicator who has two decades of experiences to complement a Master's of Science degree in Strategic Communication, please feel free to leave me a note. I will respond quickly. Very quickly.
Showing posts with label mobile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mobile. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Sunday, January 19, 2014
How well do you know your 'friends' on social media networks?
I would like to think I have a vast following of
readers for this blog, hanging on my every post about various topics relating
to strategic communication. There are thousands of IP addresses clicking in
each day, seeking my lofty, unbiased opinions about strategic communication
trends, successes, and failures. However, I have access to the “traffic stats”
for my blog and I know my vast following has yet to arrive.
I am surprised by the level of traffic I do have, but it is nothing to get
excited about just yet.
What makes for a successful opinion leader? Can
opinion leaders use social media networks as a channel to reach even more
followers than they might already have on traditional media networks? Would you
know an opinion leader is using the social media network for commercial
purposes?
Think about your own life. If you are in the market
for a new TV, will you be seeking out the opinion of your computer geek/nerd
friend or the opinion of the gym rat friend who does not even own a TV and hikes
150 miles every weekend just for fun?
According to Diffusion of Innovations theory, the
first 2.5% of people who try a new product or innovation are called “Innovators.”
The next 13.5%, called “Early Adopters” encompass most of the opinion leaders
relating to the particular subject matter at hand. These are the people the
rest of us take our cues from when making decisions relating to a particular topic.
For our example, you will rely more heavily on the
opinion of the one you feel has more of a relevant insight into which TV is a
better value for the money. But what if you have never met face-to-face this
“friend,” this opinion leader about all things electronic? The study of
electronic word of mouth marketing (WOMM), specifically in online communities,
is extremely interesting and may make you wonder about some of your “friends”
online.
A study conducted by Robert V. Kozinets and
published in the Journal of Marketing (2010) broke down how opinion leaders
were viewed after they participated in a marketing campaign, depending on how
they presented the information: did not announce it was a campaign, announced
the campaign, recommended the product or did not, etc.
Three things Kozinets observed: the message was
communicated, the communicators staked their reputation on the message, and the
message was converted by the communicators to fit the various online
communities.
Back to our TV opinion leader you have never met
face-to-face. What if you were to learn your “friend” is actually an employee
of BetterBought electronics superstore? Does that change your opinion of the recommendation
he made? How would you even know?
This makes me think about my own social media
network affiliations. I am a member of a number of general social media
networks (Facebook, Pinterest, Tumblr, Google+) as well as some
special-interest networks (Deviant, LumberJocks, Flickr, Instagram). As I note
in my profile, I make rustic furniture from recycled wooden pallets. I post
pictures and simple descriptions of the various pieces of furniture I design
and create. I upload them on LumberJocks, for example, and there are usually a
number of comments left by other members about how wonderful the project turned
out, what a great way to be “green” or questions about designs/tools, etc.
What if Irwin Tools were paying me to weave into my
discussion or responses mentions of their wood drill bits or clamping tools?
Would the other members of the community know? What would their reaction be to the
use of our little social network community for commercial gain through my “name
dropping?” What if I raved about how much easier it was to do a particular
project with the tools from Krebs for pocket-hole joinery?
[Writer’s
Note: Irwin Tools, Krebs nor any of the social media networks mentioned have
employed me to hawk their goods, sing their praises, or drop their names in any
of my blog entries. I will entertain all offers, though.]
With the proliferation of social media networks and
use of the internet touching almost every facet of our lives, WOMM is a growing
field, ripe with huge potential. In additional to the obvious ethical questions
about disclosure and transparency, how will these online opinion leaders remain
significant over time? In a TED Talk presentation from May 2011, Eli Pariser
warned of the “filter bubbles” that can be created as internet companies
incorporate relevance filters and algorithms designed to “learn” the user and
automatically filter out things it deems as not of interest to the user based
on the choices previously made.
If you routinely click on headlines about sports
events and rarely click on headlines about art shows, your searches on your web
browser will load query results with more of a connection to sports because it
has learned this is of more interest to you than query results related to art
shows. Pariser warned that these algorithms had the potential for creating a “filter
bubble” around your interactions on the web, inadvertently sheltering the user
from information that may be different, uncomfortable or just thought to be of
no relevance.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
About the Author: David is a dedicated husband and proud father of a strapping fourteen year-old son and twin five year-old daughters. He has twenty years of professional communication experience, working in the public relations field. He has worked for public relations firms in Metro Detroit, hospitals and a state-wide faith-based social service organization helping at-risk children and their families. He grew up on a mid-sized Michigan blueberry farm, spent two years in Texas and now resides with his family outside Tampa, Florida. An avid reader and photographer, David also enjoys building furniture using recycled/upcycled wooden pallets.
Sunday, January 12, 2014
Remaining Relevant
Welcome to the resurgence of
my (mostly) professional blog, focused on topics relating to strategic
communications and the topics that impact the field, including diffusion of
innovations, opinion leadership, social media, government communication,
strategic vision, message development, crisis communication, successful
communication and measurement, and many more.
My name is David Jablonski.
No, not the world renowned geophysical sciences professor from the University
of Chicago. Nor the urologist working in the Orlando, Florida area. I’m the guy
who graduated from Michigan State University in 1987 with a Communications
degree and has 20 years of professional communications experience, working in
the public relations field.
After the economic downturn
in 2007, I left the field and thought I would explore the retail/merchandising
field. And while I have enjoyed progressive success in this new (for me) field,
my heart and true love is still the communication field and how it influences
almost every aspect of every field you can imagine.
In order to remain relevant return to the
field, I felt I needed to expand and grow my own skills and knowledge base, so I
enrolled in the Strategic Communications Master’s program at Troy University.
One of my professors (Dr. Steven Padgett) requires a professional blog as part
of the coursework and I am embarking on the second course under his direction;
thus the “resurgence” of this blog.
Thank you for reading this
far. For your future reference, the address for this blog is:
My goal (in addition to an ‘A’
in this class) is to publish a new post each week for the next nine weeks and
beyond. While this blog is a
requirement for my course, it goes beyond simply checking off an item on a list
of things to do. This will give me an opportunity and outlet to provide some
insight and thought-provoking information for fellow communicators as well as
those looking to understand what a strategic communicator utilizes (tools,
skills, research, etc.) when developing a specific course of action or a
strategic communication plan.
The Asset-Light Generation
A great discussion about the difficulties faced by newspaper publishers written by Alan D. Mutter, media consultant, introduced me to the term ‘asset-light generation,’ a term coined by Mary Meeker, a partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, one of the top venture-capital firms in Silicon Valley, according to Mutter’s post.
Mutter’s
post and the report by Meeker
(linked in Mutter’s post) outline one of the most significant challenges faced
by newspaper publishers: remaining relevant to the younger generations who have
grown up with digital devices like computers, video games, cell phones, and
tablets – and who rely on those devices for news instead of traditional printed
newspapers.
According
to Meeker, the asset-light generation prefers to have services do “chores” for
them (grocery shopping, home/car cleaning, laundry/dry cleaning, lawn care,
etc.) and do more from their smartphones or other computing devices (banking,
investing, shopping, reading, etc.), thereby keeping their “assets” minimalized
and mobile.
How do
publishers connect with this segment of the population? How do they transform
their existing product (printed newspapers) and make it not only accessible to
the asset-light generation, but also desired and relevant? It’s a question yet
to be answered, but from this communicator’s viewpoint, the starting point is
better understanding the audience segment in question. What drives this group?
What are the important beliefs and values held by the asset-light? What are the
things that will turn them away?
Understanding
the diffusion of innovations research would be a great place to start for
publishers. Les Robinson’s article “A summary of Diffusion of Innovations”
notes a key component for tapping into the diffusion of innovations five
distinct categories – Innovators, Early Adopters, Early Majority, Late
Majority, and Laggards – is to recognize each of these categories has its own “personality”
and there will be different approaches needed to connect with each group.
Social Media Networks
According to the Diffusions of Innovations (DoI) theory as outlined by EverettRodgers (1995), diffusion is the process by which an innovation (1) is communicated through certain channels (2) over time (3) among the members of a social system(4). What will be critical for newspaper publishers to understand is that the rise of social media networks (Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Tumblr, Pheed, etc.) has dramatically changed three of those major ingredients: channels, time, and social system.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
About the Author: David is a dedicated husband and proud
father of a strapping fourteen year-old son and twin five year-old daughters.
He has twenty years of professional communication experience, working in the
public relations field. He has worked for public relations firms in Metro
Detroit, hospitals and a state-wide faith-based social service organization
helping at-risk children and their families. He grew up on a mid-sized Michigan
blueberry farm, spent two years in Texas and now resides with his family
outside Tampa, Florida. An avid reader and photographer, David also enjoys
building furniture using recycled/upcycled wooden pallets.
Labels:
blog,
communications,
communicators,
digital,
education,
internet,
media,
mobile,
newspapers,
positive,
print,
smartphone,
strategic,
tablet
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
What the future holds
Well, this has certainly been quite a learning experience for me. While I have blogged before -- since 2005 -- this blog is my first attempt at providing actual information people might use or learn from about new technology, new media and how it impacts the world of communication.
One of the most interesting things I have learned is about media convergence. How print media, broadcast media and social media have started to converge and blur the lines between what were very separate media segments only 3-5 years ago. And while the event was horrific, it was a stunning example of exactly what we were talking about when the Boston Marathon bombing happened and we all got to see how social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) was combined with traditional print media as well as broadcast media to first make people aware of the bombings, the impact and aftermath of the bombings, the identification of the bombing suspects and the eventual capture of the last remaining suspect -- all in a span of five days.
The other interesting topic I learned about was crowdsourcing. I think it was most interesting because it was something I was already doing on my Facebook page and just didn't know it had an actual name for it.
But, as the saying goes, all good things come to an end. Or, in this case, to a more relaxed schedule. I may not be posting on a weekly basis moving forward, but I do plan to keep this blog up and active. I have a feeling it may become a class requirement in future courses (especially if I have the same instructor), so rather than reinvent the wheel, so to speak, I will maintain this site and update it less frequently.
I would like to think all the readers who have stopped and checked out my blog and even if you didn't leave a comment, I appreciate your time and consideration.
One of the most interesting things I have learned is about media convergence. How print media, broadcast media and social media have started to converge and blur the lines between what were very separate media segments only 3-5 years ago. And while the event was horrific, it was a stunning example of exactly what we were talking about when the Boston Marathon bombing happened and we all got to see how social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) was combined with traditional print media as well as broadcast media to first make people aware of the bombings, the impact and aftermath of the bombings, the identification of the bombing suspects and the eventual capture of the last remaining suspect -- all in a span of five days.
The other interesting topic I learned about was crowdsourcing. I think it was most interesting because it was something I was already doing on my Facebook page and just didn't know it had an actual name for it.
But, as the saying goes, all good things come to an end. Or, in this case, to a more relaxed schedule. I may not be posting on a weekly basis moving forward, but I do plan to keep this blog up and active. I have a feeling it may become a class requirement in future courses (especially if I have the same instructor), so rather than reinvent the wheel, so to speak, I will maintain this site and update it less frequently.
I would like to think all the readers who have stopped and checked out my blog and even if you didn't leave a comment, I appreciate your time and consideration.
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Technology & Learning: Legos in the dark
When is it appropriate to give children technology? Do you give a infant a cell phone? Can toddlers operate radio controlled toys?
This week we looked at technology and learning. There are a couple main thoughts: does exposure to technology help or hurt children? Why do children seem to know intuitively how to operate technology (smartphones, VCRs, MP3 players, tablets, etc.)
Having grown up in the technology age, I don't believe technology has hurt me, but of course, I am hardly objective about it. My son has been using a computer of one type or another since he was four or five years old (or younger). He learned to use a mouse and/or trackball pointing device quickly and then applied that to other devices (toys) that tried to be computer-like. As he has gotten older, he has learned to use touch screens (smartphones, tablets) as well as the mouse.
Learning to read improved his ability to navigate through various technology devices (VCRs, video game consoles, etc.) and learning the meaning of words like "source," "menu," "auxiliary," etc., has further empowered him to navigate his way autonomously across devices.
Of the newer devices we have in our home because of our twin four-year old daughters, I notice device manufacturers and/or software developers are pairing words with images on the controls (Leapster, Leapfrog tablet) of devices for children, allowing kids to navigate through the various screens to play games by themselves at even younger ages. What's interesting is that I notice these same "icons" on devices (Kindle, smartphones, etc.) for adults, too.
I think manufacturers are working to make the interfaces more simple and intuitive for all ages, reducing reading as a barrier for use. Much the way the universal roadway signs are used across the globe now, ensuring drivers know the road ahead is "curvy" because of the picture on the sign, not because the driver can read the words "sharp turn ahead" if the sign is in English and the driver is fluent in French.
There has been some research (oddly, much of it coming from the UK) trying to determine if the early use of technology is harmful to children. My review of the literature seems to point that the findings are far from conclusive one way or another. As a parent, I can see where unsupervised and non-age appropriate exposure to the use of technology could lead to potential issues, but if the children are using the technology in an age-appropriate manner with parent or adult supervision and involvement, I believe that should ensure no harm comes to the child.
In our house (much to the chagrin of my son), we have established "screen time" allotments for every day. For instance, he is allowed three hours total for recreational screen time: television, video games, computer use (other than school work) or movies. And further ruining his life, we don't allow him to use video games on his Xbox or Wii unless they are rated appropriately for his age group, regardless of what "all his other friends are allowed to" do. Even some of the ones rated for "teen" are banned in our home if they are too graphic, violent or sexual in nature. Yes, we are those parents: involved.
At four years old, the twins rarely use their Leapster video games -- which are actually educational games teaching them to count, colors, letters, etc. -- for a combined three hours each day.
The twins are more likely to play for 20 minutes and move on to some other toy. They utilize more TV screen time than video games or computer use. Again, their TV use is geared more for educational programming, so the use of technology is far from harmful. And, of course, Family Movie & Pizza Night (Fridays) doesn't count toward any one's screen time, as it is family time which means my wife and I are actively involved in whatever movie or program we happen to be watching together as a family.
My son actually learned to read by using the computer program Hooked on Phonics, further combining technology with learning. My youngest daughter is well on her way to the same outcome using her Leapster. The technology has allowed both children to learn at their own pace, despite being nearly 10 years apart.
Back to my original questions: Of course, an infant can't independently use a cell phone, but they can learn from mimicking the behavior they see others engaging in as to the use of a cell phone. A toddler most likely cannot successfully use a radio controlled helicopter or car as his or her fine motor skills aren't refined enough, but toddlers definitely can successfully utilize age-appropriate technology, allowing them to be prepared for adoption of more technologically advanced devices as they get older.
I am excited about the marvels my children will have the opportunity to experience as they get older and more and more advances are made in the technology we use in our everyday lives. And the advances they will get to share with their own kids, someday? Very exciting, heady stuff.
With active parental supervision and involvement, age-appropriate technology wouldn't be any more harmful -- or potentially harmful -- than any other toy. Any toy, regardless of its level of technology, can be dangerous if used incorrectly. Ever stepped on a Lego block in the dark? I believe I have made my case.
~~~~~~
David has three children under the age of 14, including four-year old twin daughters. His wife, a web designer getting a Master's degree in Psychology, is a self-professed techno-geek and an early adopter of all cool gadgets that do not include the ability to photograph her. Despite the dangers and terror Lego blocks bring to the night shadows, they believe advanced technology promotes early learning and creativity even with Legos.
This week we looked at technology and learning. There are a couple main thoughts: does exposure to technology help or hurt children? Why do children seem to know intuitively how to operate technology (smartphones, VCRs, MP3 players, tablets, etc.)
Having grown up in the technology age, I don't believe technology has hurt me, but of course, I am hardly objective about it. My son has been using a computer of one type or another since he was four or five years old (or younger). He learned to use a mouse and/or trackball pointing device quickly and then applied that to other devices (toys) that tried to be computer-like. As he has gotten older, he has learned to use touch screens (smartphones, tablets) as well as the mouse.
Learning to read improved his ability to navigate through various technology devices (VCRs, video game consoles, etc.) and learning the meaning of words like "source," "menu," "auxiliary," etc., has further empowered him to navigate his way autonomously across devices.
Of the newer devices we have in our home because of our twin four-year old daughters, I notice device manufacturers and/or software developers are pairing words with images on the controls (Leapster, Leapfrog tablet) of devices for children, allowing kids to navigate through the various screens to play games by themselves at even younger ages. What's interesting is that I notice these same "icons" on devices (Kindle, smartphones, etc.) for adults, too.
I think manufacturers are working to make the interfaces more simple and intuitive for all ages, reducing reading as a barrier for use. Much the way the universal roadway signs are used across the globe now, ensuring drivers know the road ahead is "curvy" because of the picture on the sign, not because the driver can read the words "sharp turn ahead" if the sign is in English and the driver is fluent in French.
There has been some research (oddly, much of it coming from the UK) trying to determine if the early use of technology is harmful to children. My review of the literature seems to point that the findings are far from conclusive one way or another. As a parent, I can see where unsupervised and non-age appropriate exposure to the use of technology could lead to potential issues, but if the children are using the technology in an age-appropriate manner with parent or adult supervision and involvement, I believe that should ensure no harm comes to the child.
In our house (much to the chagrin of my son), we have established "screen time" allotments for every day. For instance, he is allowed three hours total for recreational screen time: television, video games, computer use (other than school work) or movies. And further ruining his life, we don't allow him to use video games on his Xbox or Wii unless they are rated appropriately for his age group, regardless of what "all his other friends are allowed to" do. Even some of the ones rated for "teen" are banned in our home if they are too graphic, violent or sexual in nature. Yes, we are those parents: involved.
At four years old, the twins rarely use their Leapster video games -- which are actually educational games teaching them to count, colors, letters, etc. -- for a combined three hours each day.
The twins are more likely to play for 20 minutes and move on to some other toy. They utilize more TV screen time than video games or computer use. Again, their TV use is geared more for educational programming, so the use of technology is far from harmful. And, of course, Family Movie & Pizza Night (Fridays) doesn't count toward any one's screen time, as it is family time which means my wife and I are actively involved in whatever movie or program we happen to be watching together as a family.
My son actually learned to read by using the computer program Hooked on Phonics, further combining technology with learning. My youngest daughter is well on her way to the same outcome using her Leapster. The technology has allowed both children to learn at their own pace, despite being nearly 10 years apart.
Back to my original questions: Of course, an infant can't independently use a cell phone, but they can learn from mimicking the behavior they see others engaging in as to the use of a cell phone. A toddler most likely cannot successfully use a radio controlled helicopter or car as his or her fine motor skills aren't refined enough, but toddlers definitely can successfully utilize age-appropriate technology, allowing them to be prepared for adoption of more technologically advanced devices as they get older.
I am excited about the marvels my children will have the opportunity to experience as they get older and more and more advances are made in the technology we use in our everyday lives. And the advances they will get to share with their own kids, someday? Very exciting, heady stuff.
With active parental supervision and involvement, age-appropriate technology wouldn't be any more harmful -- or potentially harmful -- than any other toy. Any toy, regardless of its level of technology, can be dangerous if used incorrectly. Ever stepped on a Lego block in the dark? I believe I have made my case.
~~~~~~
David has three children under the age of 14, including four-year old twin daughters. His wife, a web designer getting a Master's degree in Psychology, is a self-professed techno-geek and an early adopter of all cool gadgets that do not include the ability to photograph her. Despite the dangers and terror Lego blocks bring to the night shadows, they believe advanced technology promotes early learning and creativity even with Legos.
Labels:
blog,
communications,
communicators,
digital,
education,
internet,
media,
mobile,
smartphone,
tablet,
television,
weblog
Sunday, May 5, 2013
Blogging: Get on-board or be left at the station
While looking
at a lot of the current and recent research connected to social media --
specifically blogging -- as a cutting edge communication tool, it has become
pretty clear there are some simple truths to be noted:
1)
Internet use continues to increase around the
globe, even in less technologically developed countries. While the access
method may be changing (desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet, smartphone,
etc.), more and more people are being “connected” to the Internet.
2)
Blogging continues to rise as a tool for
information dissemination, whether it is being done by companies, public
relations practitioners, journalists or “citizen journalists.”
3)
Those
who are embracing the use of social media as a means of making more customized,
meaningful connections (or relationships) with various audience segments are potentially
able to strengthen their branding
efforts.
Internet Use
As noted in a
recent quarterly update for Internet service providers, Internet use/growth is
expected to continue even in the United States by 3% annually through 2017.
Growth will be much higher in less developed regions. While the method of
access might continue to evolve, the bottom line remains the same: People
continue to use the Internet more and more, whether it is via a desktop
computer, a laptop computer, a smartphone or a tablet device. Being accessible
via the Internet should remain a critical component of any company’s comprehensive
strategic communication program.
As the Baby Boomer
generation ages, use of the Internet by “older” groups continues to grow.
Younger generations have grown up with the technology, so it is doubtful their
use will diminish. Rather, the tech-savvy generations may become more
discriminating in their sources of information.
Blogging
As a format
for sharing information, connecting with customers, or demonstrating an area of
expertise in a particular field, weblogs continue to grow. As noted in my
previous blog entries, “citizen journalists” use blogs to drawn attention to
issues not covered by mainstream media or from a slightly different perspective
than the same stories that are covered by mainstream media.
Credibility
continues to be an issue for bloggers. The ability to demonstrate support,
proof and reasoned commentary through the use of blogs will be increasingly
important to those who desire to be professional and successful bloggers.
Journalists often maintain supplemental blogs in addition to their published
works on either broadcast or print media, helping to solidify the overall credibility
of blogs.
Journalists
aren’t the only ones using blogs. Companies use social media like blogging to
build their brands. According to Richard Honack, lecturer of executive programs
at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management "social networks
do not sell product, do not sell services, they sell brands, they are brand
builders."
Even leading
communication/journalism educators, helping prepare future practitioners to be
well-rounded, diversified strategic communicators are incorporating ongoing
blogs to be part of the student’s coursework.
Branding
Branding is
not a new concept. Building and strengthening a brand via the Internet is
becoming much more important. The basic building blocks of branding online are
the same, essentially, as off. The Internet merely allows these traditional
functions to happen at greater speed and with increased need for responsiveness
by the companies looking to establish and build their brands.
As noted in a
great introduction to using the Internet as a branding tool from 2007, to build
a brand a company needs to understand
its customers. What motivates them, what attracts them, what turns them
off. A company needs to utilize a full spectrum of marketing communication channels and techniques to gain insight and
have interaction with their current,
past and future customers. And finally, the content supplied by these companies has to have value.
Information
supplied and collected via use of the Internet moves at a much faster pace than
branding efforts in a traditional marketing branding model. Social media like
Facebook, Twitter and even blogging allows companies to establish direct
connections with potential, current and former customers in nearly real time,
allowing for a deeper, more personal connection between the consumer and the
brand.
What does it
all mean?
Simply put,
the Internet and use of blogs will continue to grow as a highly targeted interactive
communication vehicle, enabling communicators – regardless of their
professional capacity – with an opportunity to establish and build brand
awareness and loyalty for their business endeavors or clients. The savvy
communicator needs to recognize this opportunity and get on-board with this
developing technology in order to remain relevant in the marketplace. The
alternative is that you will be left behind.
Sources:
Internet service providers - quarterly update 4/15/2013. (2013). ().
Austin, United States, Austin: Hoover's Inc. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1341267270?accountid=38769
"Put
yourself in the Spotlight; Evolving your brand means evolving your marketing.
All signs point to social media as the way to go. Just ask
broker-turned-marketing-guru Ryan Hanley." Employee Benefit Adviser 1 May 2013: 24. General OneFile. Web. 5 May 2013.
Simmons, G. J. (2007). "i-branding": Developing the
internet as a branding tool. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 25(6), 544-562.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02634500710819932
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Crowdsourcing: The new R&D
It is sort of funny when you have been participating in a
particular activity for a long period of time, only to find out that there is
an actual name for the activity and a whole field of
study developing and devoted to it. I will discuss how I have already
been using this method long before I knew it had a name at the end of this
entry.
The activity is
called “crowdsourcing.” As I have recently completed some research in this
area, the most simplistic definition is this:
'Crowdsourcing'
is an open call to a variety of sources to gather information, ideas and/or
innovations.
But what does that
mean? To the neophyte, it might sound like a new way to describe a focus group.
And, in fact, it kind of is. The main difference is, in today's high-tech
world, crowdsourcing utilizes the internet, social media and word of mouth.
Let talk about
what crowdsourcing can do and that might help fill out the definition for those
less acquainted with the emerging media and technology that is changing the
business landscape almost daily. Let's pretend I make widgets. They are good,
quality widgets and I have a fairly stable customer base that buys my widgets.
But there is rumor floating in the trade press (online, of course) that my
biggest rival is looking at ways to improve their widget and it will
revolutionize the whole widget industry. What can I do? I call in my own
Research and Development (R&D) team and ask them what improvements could be
made to make the widgets better. They have nothing. So I turn to my Executive
Vice President (EVP) of Strategic Communication (a product of Troy University,
of course) and ask her how she can help.
My EVP suggests
floating the issue out on a variety of social media sites, seeking input from
users about how widgets could be improved. She also suggests finding user
groups that are made of people similar (but not exact) in knowledge
and background to our R&D team and create a challenge -- with a $10,000
prize to the winner -- for workable ideas to improve our standard widget.
Her suggestions
are, in effect, outsourcing the R&D to people who might have a slightly
different view of widgets (production, features, manufacture, etc.) with
a sizable reward for the winning idea as well as outsourcing some
marketing research through user-oriented focus group information gathering
about what the end user would like to see different about widgets in general.
The cost?
Ultimately, it’s just time spent online, connecting and collecting information
from the various groups and then number-crunching (for the research) and verification
of the improvement submissions (at least the R&D people can do something
productive). If there are no submissions that warrant awarding a prize, there
is no prize to award (money saved).
If there is a prize to be awarded, my EVP can use
this unconventional method of product improvement/manufacture as a public
relations tool to position our widget company as not only a leader in widget
development but also a progressive leader in advanced communication technology
to operate smarter and more effectively within our industry.
That is an example
of crowdsourcing. A recent high-profile example of crowdsourcing was the use of
private citizen videos and images collected from people attending the Boston
Marathon earlier this month. The authorities used traditional media as well as
social media (Twitter, Facebook, etc.) to alert private citizens that
the authorities wanted copies of any images or video taken near the
marathon's finish line where the bombs exploded and killed three people and
wounded more than 150 others.
Using those images
and video, the authorities were able to identify two suspects within days of
the bombing and then they used those same media outlets -- traditional and
social -- to distribute images of the suspects in an effort to locate
the alleged bombers. Barely more than 24 hours elapsed from when they
released those images and one bomber had been killed in a crossfire and the
other was in custody.
While the
situations are significantly different, utilizing crowdsourcing
techniques has great potential to change the landscape of almost
every arena: political, law enforcement, manufacturing, marketing, media
and education.
But how have I
been using this leading edge technology and techniques already? I'm glad you asked. In my spare time, I build patio/deck furniture out of recycled wooden
pallets. I had noticed stacks of pallets alongside a
major thoroughfare where I live and thought it was a waste of wood.
I did a little
research online and saw that coffee tables could be made from recycled wooden
pallets. At the time, my family and I had recently moved and my wife wanted a
new coffee table. So I made one for her out of recycled pallets. She was
thrilled and asked if I could make some shelves in the pantry for her, too.
Then a chair for our deck. Then a night table for my son. The list
began to grow and grow.
I knew there was a
business opportunity because except for a little glue and deck screws, I had a
"free" source of materials that could be turned into anything I was
capable of building. But what to build? I floated a question of two among my
friends on Facebook, asking what they would want for their deck or patio. I
also joined a couple online woodworking groups and joined a few ongoing
discussions about using pallet wood to build furniture.
I learned that a
double Adirondack-styled settee, featuring two chairs connected by a little
table was what people seemed most interested in having. I also learned about
the different styles of pallets -- some that are heat-treated in a kiln to
ensure no bugs are living in the wood, and some are sprayed or dipped in
chemicals to do the same thing. As a result, I will only use pallets with the
"HT" stamp to make furniture. And one of my biggest sellers is the
double "Pallirondack" Settee -- I've made four so far.
Sunday, April 21, 2013
Citizen Journalists & Blogging: Buyer Beware
I started blogging back in 2004, like many people, using the Weblog as an online personal diary or sorts, giving me a place to post images of the home renovations I was doing as well as a place to write down my feelings and thoughts about my relationship with my then-current wife and her daughters. Being the clever guy I am, I named it "David's Home Work" as it included all manner of things going on at my home. We had recently purchased a small two-bedroom house and I was converting the two car garage into two new bedrooms and a mudroom.
That was my introduction to weblogs. I have been a blogger ever since. To date, I believe I have authored three different blogs, one jointly with my current wife, about our experiences raising three children: one who spent his first decade being the center of the universe and the twin sisters he gained who turned his universe on end. This is the fourth blog I have created. I feel that my blogging has matured, much like blogging in general has matured. I will state the obvious, though. "Matured" is not the same as "mature." And that goes equally for me as well as the entire blog-osphere.
My blogging has, until now, been more about tracking my own life and the events and/or milestones that have shaped my life. Blogging in general has grown to give a voice to people all around the world, not just for their own uses as a diary, but also as a means of sharing information in a format similar to media outlets. You can now find a wide variety of blogs about various products, services, information and community action/service.
Many of the information blogs are treated and styled like highly targeted newspapers or magazines, but online. These outlets have given rise to what has been termed "citizen journalists," the people publishing these blogs. There are many reasons why people publish these "news blogs" but its usually because they feel the mainstream media is 1) ignoring an important story, 2) corrupt, or 3) both.
A great study published in New Media & Society (2010) looked at political blogs and why they began and why they continued to blog. The reasons given included statements like "to provide an alternative perspective to the mainstream media," "to help society," "to inform people about the most relevant information on topics of interest," and many more external motivations. Their internal motivations were primarily "to let off steam" but that reason faded when current motivations were considered. The findings of the study demonstrated that these political bloggers learned over time that there was a real need and desire from readers to hear an alternative viewpoint from the mainstream media relating to the political activities in the United States.
Using this one example, we can speculate that there is a similar need or desire for alternative viewpoints from the mainstream media in other areas, too, like sports, business, religions, nonprofit agencies, etc. This need has given rise to more and more of these citizen journalists establishing and promoting blogs that offer an different view of the events happening in these other areas of interest.
But just because I am motivated to publish a blog, does that mean people should actually pay attention or believe the information I publish? One of the findings from the study mentioned above was that these political bloggers found they could actually shape the national conversation to some degree by the information they provided on their blog. That can be a pretty heady position to be in for people. Having the ability to shape or even set the national agenda or conversation as it relates to a particular topic is very powerful. And we all know, power has the ability to corrupt.
Markham Nolan, managing editor of Storyful.com, provided a great discussion on TED Talks about how journalists today have to filter through all the information available on the internet (including blogs) in an effort to provide accurate information. He provided some interesting facts about the sheer volume of information being added to the internet every minute, cautioning everyone that sifting through all that information is becoming harder and harder. Nolan had some eye-opening examples about how information can be quickly verified or debunked, but his closing message applies to the entire internet, including blogs: there is a lot of information available on the internet. Not all of it is accurate, not all of it is truthful. People using the internet need to be vigilant about the information they collect, read or use from online and be sure to confirm the validity of that information before using it.
Citizen bloggers are a great resource for people who want an alternative view or perspective from the mainstream media. Often these bloggers are motivated for good reasons to help others and serve as watchdogs for business, media and government. But relying solely on these bloggers can be treacherous, as they are not always trained as journalists. Journalists in traditional media environments are taught to fact-check their stories before ever sending it to press or air. Citizen bloggers are not always that professional, and may rush to publish information that is yet to verified or confirmed as accurate. It remains up to the media consumer, whether it be mainstream media, blogs or fringe media, to decide what information is real, accurate or appropriate for their own consumption.
Labels:
broadcast,
communications,
digital,
internet,
media,
mobile,
newspapers,
print,
television
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Mobile Device Growth: Too Far?
If you follow any type of news feed relating to technology,
the discussion about device convergence has been fairly steady for the past few
years. Moore’s Law is routinely noted as well as references to Dick Tracy’s
communicator watch, Star Trek’s “tricorder” and Nightrider’s car, Kit. All these
devices conceived in fantasy but are coming closer and closer to reality.
Computers continue to get smaller, yet smartphones seem to
get bigger. And now tablets seem to be bridging the gap between smartphones and
computers, at least in terms of size, if not functionality.
But where does the convergence end? It must at some point,
right? Or will it lead to divergence instead? There are those in the field who believe
we will see the need for stand-alone devices (link), despite the push for
convergence that has been ballyhooed for the past 20 years.
When put into practical, everyday applications I look at the
devices we currently use at the world’s largest home improvement retailer. When
I started with the company in 2008, there were stationary desktop computers
located throughout the store and everything else was run through the mobile
ordering carts, a combination of battery powered computer and small printer,
used to create price labels. And there was usually only 3-5 of the mobile
ordering carts per store. Communication was done via handheld radios and
overhead public address (PA) system.
![]() |
"Sure, once I hack into the family calendar, I can send mom an email reminder and make her think the playdate was her idea!" |
Currently, the tool of choice out on the sales floor, away
from the desktop computers located throughout the store, is the handheld device
created by Motorola that allows any associate to do a multitude of functions,
from checking on-hands and prices to creating orders, packdown lists and
requesting transfers from other locations. It also functions as the “walkie
talkie” for associates.
There is supposedly a camera built into the device, but as
far as I know, there has never been an application to use the camera.
However the “phone” is big, heavy, bulky and consumes power
much too fast – usually a new battery is required before a typical 8-hour shift
is complete. They introduced an even smaller, iPhone-sized device, but the
rumor[i]
is that a device more along the size and style of a tablet will be the next
wave of tool used by folks out on the sales floor.
It seems to be a living example of device convergence, but
while the devices or tools given to associates to use on the floor have
continued to get smaller and do more, a couple things haven’t changed.
There are still dedicated fax lines in every store. There are
still desktop computers (albeit, they have added flat screen monitors) and hardwired,
multi-lined telephones located throughout the store. And the ever-present
overhead PA system.
The advance of technology in these handheld devices could
surely duplicate all the functions of a fax machine, a desktop computer, a
telephone system and PA system. But they have made no move to replace such
devices. And this is not some little mom and pop operation. We are talking
about one of the largest retailers in
the world. Even the rumored next
device being a larger, tablet-styled device seems to fly in the face of expected
device convergence: a single, smaller device doing the functions of what had
previously done on several larger devices.
Specifically, as it relates to the mobile device market,
there seems to be a push for continued cross-over between mobile phone
communications, increased computing and internet access capabilities, camera
features – all in the tablet form.
The other aspect of this convergence of devices is the rise
of mobile-first applications or “apps.” These are programs designed first and
foremost for use on mobile devices, not desktop or browser based programming
adapted to mobile technology, like Facebook or Pinterest. Most of the big mobile-first companies are not names commonly known outside the directly
related technology field.
And the companies who create the platforms on which these apps are built
are even more obscure. Names like Flurry, Appcelerator, StackMob/Parse/Kinvey, appMobi, Sencha, Geoloqi, Localytics, Crashlytics and DeviceAnywhere
are huge in the mobile first world.
The
apps that remain big currently are from companies like Path, Instagram, Foursquare, Flipboard, Pulse, LevelUp/Dwolla, Rovno (Angry Birds), Lookout Security and Dolphin HD Browser. These
companies have mobile apps for social networking, videos, reading news, photography, location and check-ins, and many
other similar services.
I try to envision what
the world will look like to my four-year old twin daughters when they reach an
age when they are using technology everyday that I could not even dream of at my
current age. Maybe things like the Pebble Watch or Google Glass will
be commonplace, or even passé, by the time they are 20 years old. Will their
mobile devices still be hand-held or subcutaneous implants they have to receive
as a requirement for college or their first job.
![]() |
"That is great! I won't even have to cry in front of Dad! They will both be fooled!" |
Already, they try to make
things happen on my laptop by touching the screen, like my iPhone or Kindle.
They will grow up with touch screens, never knowing what the eerily glowing
green light and phosphor burn-in was all about. Even the differences between
the twins and my 14 year old son are enormous in terms of technology. He knows
that television shows air on certain nights or days, while the twins believe
every show they could ever want to see is on-demand.
[i]
Rumors are a way of life in a company as large as the one referenced. There is
no way to confirm this rumor has any validity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)